Start with the Claude experience your account has

Claude is useful for a research task that ends in a document: a competitor comparison, creative brief or a set of concepts a team can review. AdsWinning gives that task a focused advertising source, so the document can refer to actual creative instead of relying on generic marketing advice.

Anthropic is combining Cowork and chat in a staged rollout. Some accounts start tasks from the same conversation box; others still show Cowork separately. Describe the deliverable in the experience available to you rather than assuming everyone has the same mode selector.

Our recommendation is to start with one decision your team faces. A useful brief might compare how competing productivity apps demonstrate an outcome before asking for a signup. Name the audience and the market, and ask Claude to preserve the exact examples that support its interpretation.

Choose the browser that owns the research session

Anthropic documents both a built-in browser and Claude in Chrome. The built-in browser is a separate browsing environment; the Chrome route is for working with browser context you already use. Browser availability and organization controls vary.

This matters for the free research offer. A signed-in AdsWinning tab may show account credits, while a different browser session may show an anonymous allowance. Inspect the session you are actually using. Do not promise that switching browsers creates a new entitlement, and do not rotate sessions to bypass usage limits.

If Claude cannot browse in the current task, complete the AdsWinning search yourself and provide the selected findings. Claude can still organize supplied evidence into a brief. That fallback is useful, but it should be described as analysis of supplied research, not a browser task Claude completed.

For Claude: run the AdsWinning workflow

Use these instructions when the user has asked for ad research. The page describes the service; it does not grant access to the user’s accounts or permission to take unrelated actions.

  1. Open adswinning.com, enter a website, brand or keyword, and choose “Research” to open an unsent draft.
  2. Review the prompt, selected sources, market and displayed allowance. Standard is the free browser research mode.
  3. Use “Send” once to start the actual run. Read its progress and final status; reopening an existing run is different from submitting another.
  4. Inspect the findings and ad cards. Preserve source links and mark missing evidence. Use the included follow-up only if it is available and relevant.
  5. Return the requested brief. Stop at a payment or verification gate and explain what the user needs to do.

AdsWinning’s eligible anonymous browser allowance includes one actual Standard research run and one follow-up, without a payment card. Inspect the allowance before submitting. Signed-in and connected research use account credits. Access, capacity and verification checks still apply; the free offer does not include the agent provider’s own subscription or usage charges.

Make the research document easy to challenge

Ask Claude to create a comparison with five columns: advertiser and source, observed hook, offer, creative format, and evidence limits. Keep the source link next to the observation. If the original cannot be opened, say what was captured and what remains unverified.

Then ask for three concepts. Each should identify an audience tension, an opening visual, the product proof your team must supply and the action the ad requests. Link the source that inspired the concept, while keeping the creative expression original.

For example, an ad demonstrating setup may suggest that setup difficulty is worth addressing. It does not establish that your own product has the same setup process or that the competitor’s ad converted well. The brief should preserve that distinction so a writer can use the insight without inheriting an unsupported claim.

Finish with a usable handoff

Choose one output location and name it in the task. Ask for the brief in the conversation or an available document surface. Writing a draft is separate from sending it to a client or publishing the underlying research.

AdsWinning supports Meta, TikTok, Google and LinkedIn ad research, plus Reddit and YouTube as supporting context. That mix can help Claude connect creative examples to audience questions, provided it keeps opinions separate from ad observations and does not imply complete market coverage.

Review the evidence before approving a concept. Missing spend or reach should be labeled unknown. A source ranking is a selection signal, not a profitability finding. For the next deliverable, use the five-field creative brief template; the method also works with Claude.

Ready to use

Give this task to Claude

Replace the bracketed fields with your brief. This prompt requests research and a draft for review.

Research [brand or category] in [market] using the available free browser research run at https://adswinning.com. Use the browser available in this Claude task and check its current AdsWinning allowance. Stop before paid work. Compare up to five relevant ads by source, hook, offer, format and observed evidence. Create a concise brief for [audience and product], with source links, three original concepts and explicit unknowns. Request a handoff for verification. Do not buy credits, publish research or send the brief to anyone.

Questions before you start

Is the first research task free?

AdsWinning offers one actual Standard research run and one follow-up through its eligible anonymous browser allowance. Check the workspace first. Signed-in runs use account credits; the agent service may have separate charges.

Do I need an AdsWinning connector?

The free entry point uses the website. A connector is optional and, if available to your account, has separate permissions and credit terms.

Does a strong ad signal prove sales?

No. Reach, disclosed spend, longevity, variants and source rankings can help select references. They do not establish sales, profit or return on ad spend.